1
فارغالتحصیل سطح سه مؤسسۀ امام صادق و دانشپژوه مؤسسۀ دارالاعلام لمدرسة اهلالبیت (نویسندۀ مسئول)
2
استادیار دانشگاه ادیان و مذاهب.
Abstract
In the Holy Sharia, blasphemy against Taghut has been mentioned in many cases. Some Takfirists interpret this Quranic teaching as the necessity of accusing others to heresy. If someone do not follow their viewpoint in this subject, they accuse him to heresy. In this essay and by the descriptive analysis method, it is found that this Takfiri idea has no precedent in Islam and even the Takfirists themselves have different views in this subject. Finally, this idea is against the Islamic rules and the Arabic language.
Alidoost,M and Alemojadded Shirazi,S H . (2022). Criticizing the necessity of accusing cruel Muslim Rulers to heresy from the viewpoint of Takfirists. Research on Salafi Movement, 8(15), 111-134.
MLA
Alidoost,M , and Alemojadded Shirazi,S H . "Criticizing the necessity of accusing cruel Muslim Rulers to heresy from the viewpoint of Takfirists", Research on Salafi Movement, 8, 15, 2022, 111-134.
HARVARD
Alidoost M, Alemojadded Shirazi S H. (2022). 'Criticizing the necessity of accusing cruel Muslim Rulers to heresy from the viewpoint of Takfirists', Research on Salafi Movement, 8(15), pp. 111-134.
CHICAGO
M Alidoost and S H Alemojadded Shirazi, "Criticizing the necessity of accusing cruel Muslim Rulers to heresy from the viewpoint of Takfirists," Research on Salafi Movement, 8 15 (2022): 111-134,
VANCOUVER
Alidoost M, Alemojadded Shirazi S H. Criticizing the necessity of accusing cruel Muslim Rulers to heresy from the viewpoint of Takfirists. Research on Salafi Movement. 2022;8(15):111-134 (In Persian).