Analyzing the criteria of criticizing documents from the perspective of the Salafism, with an emphasis on the position of the narrator's sect
Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1
Professor
2
Assistant Professor of Law and Jurisprudence Department, University of Religions and Religions, Qom, Iran
3
دانشیار دانشگاه ادیان و مذاهب
Abstract
The majority of Hadith scholars paid foremost attention to the document's authenticity in Hadiths. Scholars of hadith have considered certain qualities necessary for a narrator, among which "justice and accuracy" are the most important. The examination and analysis of the performance of the narrators of hadith shows that the majority of scholars have accepted the narrations of other religious sects if the reliability of the narrator is confirmed. Among them, proponents of Salafism, with incorrect and contrary interpretations of the practices of the Salaf, by interfering with the beliefs and religion of the narrator in accepting hadiths, have provided the grounds for the destruction and disappearance of a significant portion of the Prophetic tradition.The present essay criticizes their method of not accepting the narrations of trustworthy individuals from the innovators who have transmitted them in confirmation of the religious sect and considers the acceptance of such traditions necessary based on the approach of earlier scholars.
Keywords
