1
کارشناس ارشد کلام اسلامی و فارغ التحصیل موسسه دارالإعلام لمدرسة أهل البیت
2
استادیار پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشه
Abstract
It has been a long time that logic has been responsible for demonstrating the rules of rational reasoning which are divided based on their forms to comparison, analogy, and induction. But Salafis do not accept these logical forms and consider them faulty. It’s because they argue that as long as we have the Quranic forms of rational reasoning (Quranic Mizan or standard and comparison of priority), there is no need for forms of logical reasoning. Not only their objection to logic is not reasonable, but also their presentation of new forms are in fact, the repetition of the logical forms.
Husseini Poor,S A and Jebreili,M . (2016). Analyzing the forms of reasoning in the viewpoint of Salafis and criticizing them in a logical way. Research on Salafi Movement, 2(3), 7-25.
MLA
Husseini Poor,S A , and Jebreili,M . "Analyzing the forms of reasoning in the viewpoint of Salafis and criticizing them in a logical way", Research on Salafi Movement, 2, 3, 2016, 7-25.
HARVARD
Husseini Poor S A, Jebreili M. (2016). 'Analyzing the forms of reasoning in the viewpoint of Salafis and criticizing them in a logical way', Research on Salafi Movement, 2(3), pp. 7-25.
CHICAGO
S A Husseini Poor and M Jebreili, "Analyzing the forms of reasoning in the viewpoint of Salafis and criticizing them in a logical way," Research on Salafi Movement, 2 3 (2016): 7-25,
VANCOUVER
Husseini Poor S A, Jebreili M. Analyzing the forms of reasoning in the viewpoint of Salafis and criticizing them in a logical way. Research on Salafi Movement. 2016;2(3):7-25 (In Persian).